The government isn't working in the best interests of society with these decisions, if they were we wouldn't have to make them in the first place. Yet here we are after we got clear indications these companies did exactly what they shouldn't be and we let it slide. We have proven that companies who have balanced competition and do not commit fraud lead to the best outcomes for society, there are countless studies that show exactly how much your hurting your country by not doing these things. The welfare of one company should never affect any market if you want it to run the most efficiently in a competitive market, and every employee should be held to the highest standards of the rule of law. Meaning if you actually have a situation where a company can control the market that's literally the point where you split them up, that's your indication right there. The market functions best when the fewest businesses can be price givers and all of them are price takers. Sorry but you don't understand economics, this a bad idea. Shaw, and collected $2.7 million in speaking fees from Wall Street companies that received government bailout money." He earned $5 million from the hedge fund D. His nomination was fortunately blocked but Obama instead made him Director of the White House United States National Economic Council so he could be a "key economic decision-maker in the Obama administration's response to the Great Recession"-the same recession that he helped cause.īonus fact about this guy: "On ApSummers came under renewed criticism after it was disclosed that he was paid millions of dollars the previous year by companies which he now has influence over as a public servant. The original article was written many years ago, then re-published in response to Obama nominating one of these guys to run the Federal Reserve. It goes back to at least the 90's under Bill Clinton when the Glass-Steagall Act was repealed. It exposes exactly which people and banks were buying off the government and what they did with their influence. If you really want to know why the government stopped protecting us from unscrupulous banking practices and started helping them instead then I recommend reading this article by forensic economist and investigative reporter Greg Palast. Want to submit a video which is not a documentary? Respect the community, and do not consign their comments to the memory hole. If your submission is popular, please don't delete it. Always message the mods instead of attacking users in public. No file lockers, torrents or linkjacking: site must stream video.Īny brigading or continual harassment of one user against another may result in a ban. if they're wrong, tell them why! Personal attacks or comments that insult, demean or threaten users will be removed and result in bans. Mods reserve the right to apply the don't be a jackass rule. The following are not considered documentaries on this subreddit: TV news, articles, interviews, lectures, amateur home videos, mockumentaries, biopics, and vlogs. Soliciting for donations or linking to your own YouTube channel is annoying and prohibited.ĭocumentaries only. Please upvote if it adds to intelligent discussion, downvote if it doesn't. tag is mandatory in the description for trailers A (CC) tag in the description is strongly encouraged. Do not post titles or descriptions using 100% capitalised words. Posting format: Title (year) - optional short description Ĭorrect title, year of release and length are mandatory. ![]() ![]() Submissions and comments from brand-new accounts will be removed. Welcome, friends! Check the top of the subreddit for a request thread Search By Topic
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |